|
发表于 2017-6-3 11:13:41
|
显示全部楼层
MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details
# u" T9 W" A6 d1 z- x( C4 P
) _& o6 ~# G; x7 h+ _/ z ]. p. Y1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?: _9 h3 {1 O! Q$ U) `2 x C: Y c
(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)
3 C# m8 E; j! P$ A, hA- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2
$ O( G' \7 p" c% ~$ f# q# Y) jdebug ppp authentication
4 U. d1 M* I$ H1 Y7 k1 d2 GB- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2
9 z' J4 ?, k' }$ t" }6 \+ R; `debug ppp authentication: P+ G1 v; V: G9 S, Y3 h b
C- debug int s0/1
7 q5 h) t5 r8 x$ I3 {debug int 0/2
) `& j, H* ?! p2 Rdebug ppp authentication( x1 }9 |8 f; p6 ~0 V
D- debug condition interface FIRST/ B; G5 a" Z: N/ D& A4 G x/ ~
debug condition interface SECOND
! o& w8 f8 R& m6 d5 z2 ]; z+ ydebug ppp authenication
- \0 C: i- Q( E* O" Q% j3 q( _1 f7 \
3 c" V9 Q7 V& H" G5 m3 zAnswer: D? or C
* y9 e! }" K8 P8 \3 ]9 e3 zExplanation:
' s( l$ F" Q# g% l0 x% t5 n$ lLink:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html
5 e/ z F) x/ S) _ d' |- V
- y* C, o! f, c6 [) h5 a! O4 ?$ O' U2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)
* ^9 O3 I5 U+ T" a; m5 x- vAnswer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)" Y# u! g. b" Q" l# |6 h: N8 S
: B& K" v k3 o0 E
3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links
% a* |7 N- h$ v a! nmtu size with ping command?( [7 N8 h& e7 Q! h0 Q/ X
A- ping 10.1.1.1 size 15019 ]/ ^# z4 i. }3 g' p1 y
B- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit
' {, s1 k4 T4 X; bC- ???1 I$ `$ O( k4 ~- g! A
D- ???
# s. e0 V+ Y5 H: \Answer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping) B4 o; o8 M! G/ y6 f5 i% q
* ~/ ]+ l9 @1 Q- k/ G6 N
4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (
* s5 u7 z0 T9 k! [Topology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)7 w9 }+ \3 W5 s, s9 v
A- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down
+ X$ D% h( O0 h0 |% t7 z- t( HB- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)
* m. x+ u1 R1 GC- ???6 s# q, f5 S+ l
D- ???* g$ Y# S! ?6 r7 a/ _" x
answer: AB
# X0 E0 i) [0 ] C" G% H5 ~6 a8 b1 x; v) H% b# Q/ h
5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)
1 z4 `: _: T4 D' v7 n- A. G4 f(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the) I; _; t b m" d( t1 Q
other FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes)
; N! P$ a& C6 R! CA- they are not neighs (wrong)
. S2 f! M. `+ I% Y6 VB- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R2- |% {3 d) ]7 N* ?# K! e; }
C- ???3 A% c9 s/ n1 Q& Q1 T, ^: r
D- ???/ e5 e: B. J' k
E- ???% ~, Z+ g7 o, Z Z5 u
Answer: B e ???/ s$ o3 Z' {/ R/ I+ i$ K& v% s
Note:
- }: F. z; D; m4 U4 g _0 D@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,- @, L' Q5 T; |- J4 H9 _$ Z M( c3 a
NBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.: H8 y- q6 L0 I( W& I# \
The routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes./ f* C- T W- i' S3 G2 p
@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that
9 y; c6 j: L2 @$ Hshows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates. c) Z& N8 n# e$ T
6 _" a% |7 Y5 [2 Z7 N* _
6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established
' w r( t7 x& f3 k7 B8 d% |/ q3 Lthe admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
* o1 d, m: I3 A$ A4 T0 `! Vadjacency dropped. What is the reason?/ X" h7 |6 w3 S; H" C9 X0 n
(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)9 a" E( H8 t( e* w! I4 w& W# M+ v
A- MTU mismatch7 o; S6 }' q, T* I- E2 T- j
B- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)
4 Q9 f ^ e" [% NC-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel& t9 r! Q# t; L6 q5 q, d
>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer,( ?; ~5 r e2 B( h& M
because the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,& ^" H, Q1 N. F! P# @% S
otherwise would cause Recursive Routing.
/ _: @* Z# C5 W BD-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”8 k! D H( Z5 {9 \/ n @8 S* Q
>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,( ~5 z5 l) k5 b* X
add network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.
+ m1 C: X- S: l0 O0 A) Y4 x5 n7 rAnswer: D ???) V7 i, i- p' N& C0 W& y; ]
someone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:
( z3 R0 F; _, N3 q( X$ |5 KOSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel I( H6 d$ R, R
6 I# r8 s$ {$ P3 ^
Tickets
8 S# i8 p) {& ?" t7 q* w6 ETicket – R1 – IP NAT4 n. s7 W$ }, K# V# u: b; _9 c, R
This ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.
! g+ k0 h7 {! WThe fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network
" h: p j, [- m4 j& J( ~5 [6 ]is configured with “NAT outside”.
* @4 ^7 U# r& y* K0 K( sTo correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”
. p! e8 X2 Y+ t: e- b3 v1 D
- H' O- e+ v, f! C- fTicket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP- r' S7 p* w+ z, q
OSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp |
|