CCNP排错（300-135）考试新题（6月2日更新）

vesim1

johnsmithkun

感谢楼主分享！

shinze

感謝幫主

范老莫

感谢楼主

QQ_304878

请乔帮主，多点搜集最近更新的300-135，6月份好多考友在排左队要考呢

luyanqiao

及时雨

江南/sun

thanks a lot !

forevercml

小狗

一定要回贴，因为我是文明人哦
) {  z: w3 C; R* R2 ^; d9 k2 P

DT1640759

MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details
: d, ^" I- v- g! C
( _7 N; E0 R- U; A$ n. ?+ W1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?
(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)
A- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2
/ T) ^% a  ?1 ^debug ppp authentication
! E. h) ~: x6 N# b% `2 kB- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2
debug ppp authentication
2 H9 U+ d5 R+ ~+ V* {& CC- debug int s0/1
debug int 0/2
/ R$ S8 M1 p( p2 U7 v, W! hdebug ppp authentication
; b- u6 T! p9 c" F# P% n5 r& L- ND- debug condition interface FIRST
debug condition interface SECOND
7 {9 o) H! i3 M( y; j/ Ldebug ppp authenication
% `1 ?. i% {2 F5 e% y! I
# d. M" M/ n% q& i0 f6 uAnswer: D? or C
( }' h$ j# ~& p# t. YExplanation:
Link:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html

% R: W; n/ F8 J$ E% _2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)
Answer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)

3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links
mtu size with ping command?
# r+ z2 @* i5 s/ d$ {# \A- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1501
B- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit
7 R" ]' F9 K+ v8 BC- ???
D- ???
Answer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping)

4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (
) [2 {8 d/ ]' ^! [1 bTopology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)
2 f$ K7 _, t$ _A- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down
1 N, h% \/ {5 ~4 Y1 P" JB- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)
- J. S7 d) x& j' ?' f+ nC- ???
D- ???
answer: AB
; a" q) p4 P( F+ v
3 ?# {, m7 k# M9 ^6 E7 V; B5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)
(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the
% S7 |6 u: m, t$ h, L. U3 R: \other FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes)
6 f/ J' i4 e: Q& f/ xA- they are not neighs (wrong)
B- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R2
3 t0 L* k: W+ H7 n1 }  V3 u/ @8 |C- ???
! l& @" K' d* q6 p, @" OD- ???
E- ???
5 P2 ~8 s) K+ J. w" u% y- TAnswer: B e ???
( A! P$ G. G& n2 YNote:
@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,
1 C6 L+ O& r6 Z$ SNBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.
# m' F# n8 y" P- e" UThe routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.
& M& O2 @# Y5 K9 a; n7 ~; l9 h+ d@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that
7 c) G+ @2 c# g4 p! O4 n$ B' cshows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.
) ~; @# P: n1 Q. O, O2 Q
( k2 g. L2 G% ]6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established
8 T5 O9 ?0 ?. ?the admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
6 M$ Y5 \9 Z5 k# g. }adjacency dropped. What is the reason?
' ^2 r1 X& }4 r! H6 F7 k7 Z(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)
A- MTU mismatch
7 ^) b- T* q/ ]5 q* [3 `& GB- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)
C-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel
, W7 A/ U1 O0 `( G. H>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer,
( c5 W- l' |( J7 W% F* G9 d; kbecause the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,
+ }( ^+ G+ T# o; V( Qotherwise would cause Recursive Routing.
& P6 I& x& ^9 _6 p! SD-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”
9 |9 v: S, b6 Y& ~7 N7 w+ y>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,
& O! h4 Q3 K; S# ?; Radd network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.
Answer: D ???
someone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:
. B7 W; L/ u6 e& ~5 Y3 {6 r9 o$ BOSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel

3 s, |" }1 m/ o3 XTickets
Ticket – R1 – IP NAT
. S9 o/ u! s0 H1 M9 U4 z5 IThis ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.
The fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network
, w- t' ?9 ]: u# His configured with “NAT outside”.
To correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”

Ticket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP
OSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp

DT1640759

MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details

1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?
# E% E2 @; w2 X(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)
4 M( @' ^$ I3 x1 SA- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2
debug ppp authentication
; m: J' `) I" c7 O/ rB- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2
1 T$ L& t  s, ^$ A6 Sdebug ppp authentication
4 M3 z  T- R) h5 u( [C- debug int s0/1
# a- I# V/ E; r( T8 b# B) P* Bdebug int 0/2
debug ppp authentication
D- debug condition interface FIRST
8 e! y. S( ^. [- x* W6 Udebug condition interface SECOND
" D' l6 M' u- l8 Q  hdebug ppp authenication

* m& Y/ A1 Z! y* }% @" o  O9 NAnswer: D? or C
0 N5 Z3 w# p0 L9 R# k1 BExplanation:
Link:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html

. W2 }2 ?2 _( ]) A2 k- B2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)
# t  t% R9 n4 L5 C7 y0 G& jAnswer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)
1 k  }- G! v! {" l
) m/ w9 P$ V" B6 U. C3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links
; {0 ^/ d) [1 y  g" F1 _3 g; a, vmtu size with ping command?
A- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1501
' ]; V5 P& K# d/ F. |" DB- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit
( q0 x1 K: Y! J7 p" @( L9 G2 `C- ???
7 k+ r% i/ |* y& YD- ???
: O6 H9 t4 C; I( [3 a0 |Answer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping)
! p2 g: p5 m' P; q+ N0 t& {
4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (
  g- ]: z; |2 Q5 }Topology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)
2 O0 _5 T3 `) ?: i# uA- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down
B- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)
C- ???
D- ???
5 ]! s  L4 b1 v. H- H. {9 F2 vanswer: AB

5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)
(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the
6 F! a. e. [: N6 R9 k8 Gother FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes)
4 z% y: f% }5 QA- they are not neighs (wrong)
7 a9 ]9 d" m/ |1 kB- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R2
C- ???
D- ???
E- ???
- a2 b! Z. l# b1 \# B9 PAnswer: B e ???
Note:
3 x' ^* p. D* e  X# W! C9 m: k/ o@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,
NBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.
The routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.
@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that
* o, x. D; K" T, [4 M7 R7 ushows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.
/ C$ \+ j& c& x0 u
6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established
the admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
: t4 ^& E' t7 V2 I" H, R6 madjacency dropped. What is the reason?
! z$ X4 y9 |! T# w% M(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)
5 z- s2 L8 @% LA- MTU mismatch
B- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)
C-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel
6 y4 k" b& h9 C1 a! B- w+ J>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer,
because the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,
otherwise would cause Recursive Routing.
D-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”
; F) L, p2 L. P( m" k>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,
add network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.
: R/ i1 o3 P  }8 IAnswer: D ???
9 e8 n& |: c0 ysomeone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:
OSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel
3 v% D" l% L) J7 M
Tickets
0 W* ]3 o% I: v3 d7 sTicket – R1 – IP NAT
: \- [2 E5 _: E* B/ D$ g8 l$ wThis ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.
: w" W9 {' D+ g+ d% nThe fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network
( N3 M- I8 l  ]8 j3 Y7 sis configured with “NAT outside”.
# W- A6 t! o; B. v  \To correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”

. R1 ~; T& R$ ~) nTicket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP
% [; g+ O" \1 S9 e* Q: P# n, jOSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp

DT1640759

MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details

1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?
(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)
A- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2
* u) V: L5 o% N; w6 ~' Sdebug ppp authentication
( j8 F0 q/ g; P$ S6 g0 HB- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2
debug ppp authentication
C- debug int s0/1
debug int 0/2
5 z/ D' q- D! j$ }6 P4 udebug ppp authentication
D- debug condition interface FIRST
debug condition interface SECOND
: g: F. a7 {5 s; Wdebug ppp authenication

/ d, \3 N4 j# x, F) q% |, v4 Q" ZAnswer: D? or C
: [9 c+ Z2 ^5 f' w9 }8 r* X2 pExplanation:
Link:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html
8 q6 K6 r2 `: X4 c2 x2 Y3 ^
2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)
0 |# B7 R( P& b, X$ y9 y! r  U3 w6 kAnswer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)
+ o, W( ?$ N) z  ?$ C  S
# J$ G4 \6 `/ ]3 I, D  W3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links
mtu size with ping command?
A- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1501
6 y$ Y) t& R  _1 V5 U4 OB- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit
' G7 ~+ N1 m* r+ ^& pC- ???
% S8 c7 w/ l" h& ?: U( o% a6 }$ bD- ???
Answer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping)

/ X9 a- ~6 q, w+ c& Z4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (
Topology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)
8 B; u6 q! X4 ~" @7 t8 aA- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down
B- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)
C- ???
D- ???
7 P. b( i( K3 Tanswer: AB

4 J" l& ^/ M( U1 [+ Y: ^! y  ^5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)
3 ?. |* D2 I7 F7 _1 L& x! @(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the
- ~: O. ?2 V- S5 y* C8 tother FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes)
! A/ ]- C* }% ?A- they are not neighs (wrong)
B- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R2
C- ???
D- ???
1 x& O% p: C+ l% i- cE- ???
3 |) i9 v" \' M+ e% h! o$ aAnswer: B e ???
Note:
@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,
; G+ N3 h; N1 y/ L  PNBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.
; G8 X7 l+ W( I+ {$ V& UThe routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.
) x+ e! O2 G2 O- p@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that
shows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.
5 K* j5 O9 B! G
6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established
& d- ~+ P1 s1 gthe admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
adjacency dropped. What is the reason?
(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)
  A1 S6 u9 ]: K% E& l1 s* q) G( Z% ]A- MTU mismatch
* ~) J% W. e' ~  ~B- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)
C-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel
>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer,
because the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,
otherwise would cause Recursive Routing.
  {) B' r# s0 l% z  R1 i5 {D-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”
, f* {, k5 A4 N( Z3 B$ x>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,
  \1 D& S6 t+ Y1 k7 Radd network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.
Answer: D ???
someone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:
$ U8 V- O) T, h- JOSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel
/ m% z. W5 Q- o1 Q. N( G; l
: E9 d$ a1 G! y' u0 b5 \Tickets
& q- u3 R5 h: x  Y( D3 v& F( rTicket – R1 – IP NAT
; R: Z3 s1 N3 XThis ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.
The fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network
is configured with “NAT outside”.
To correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”

8 Q" \  k0 K+ `7 b8 Q( k; @& ?Ticket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP
; e: ]5 X+ y8 @8 U5 LOSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp

tetra8888

thank you for sharing

lincd91

look look

u96628

查看