设为首页收藏本站language 语言切换
开启辅助访问 切换到宽版

鸿鹄论坛

 找回密码
 论坛注册

QQ登录

先注册再绑定QQ

鸿鹄论坛»鸿鹄论坛 › ≡□≡思科认证≡□≡ › CCNP题库战报 › CCNP排错（300-135）考试新题（6月2日更新）
12345678910... 13下一页
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 小乔
收起左侧

[考试战报] CCNP排错（300-135）考试新题（6月2日更新）

  [复制链接]
johnsmithkun
发表于 2017-6-2 18:11:03 | 显示全部楼层
感谢楼主分享！
77# 2017-6-2 18:11:03 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

QQ_304878
发表于 2017-6-2 21:24:16 | 显示全部楼层
请乔帮主，多点搜集最近更新的300-135，6月份好多考友在排左队要考呢
80# 2017-6-2 21:24:16 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

江南/sun
发表于 2017-6-2 21:59:24 | 显示全部楼层
thanks a lot !
82# 2017-6-2 21:59:24 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

小狗
发表于 2017-6-3 01:09:30 | 显示全部楼层
一定要回贴，因为我是文明人哦
  u. e0 R7 @6 C6 m. u/ N- v) H
84# 2017-6-3 01:09:30 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

DT1640759
发表于 2017-6-3 02:19:49 | 显示全部楼层
MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details
8 Q3 l' z" Q3 e6 @# P
3 s8 N1 a  f2 A! U8 B6 ]7 s1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?
0 z! F5 Z2 H: v( j# Y6 q4 X(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces): s; J2 ]5 M1 W/ f+ m0 l
A- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2' @/ W  a5 N. i0 I8 e
debug ppp authentication
. b5 e( _: g2 T  h6 X7 U/ L0 `B- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/28 I% u& Q: E7 S; y4 k
debug ppp authentication" E; [' @+ c( Y& J1 q; A
C- debug int s0/1
( D* w- W7 k& s0 ~) ydebug int 0/2
( r0 H5 p5 X' f/ n$ @! S& jdebug ppp authentication* z; D' I6 t# c( E& ^* ^+ G! G
D- debug condition interface FIRST( @& \7 G$ h: m3 u, g% G
debug condition interface SECOND2 f& Q5 {4 O1 X7 m0 \( P' ~/ e
debug ppp authenication
/ K% N( ^7 W5 o+ i: B' L; ~6 u$ T4 W# O. @6 V# ^
Answer: D? or C
8 }* _$ R7 a$ s( I0 ~, HExplanation:2 c: y9 z7 C; G) q! x( a
Link:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html
( F5 C- {) v/ ?# q' |, s; t2 |1 v& q+ R$ X5 t2 r
2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)
5 P. @2 ^7 ^5 K4 D4 c  c; V) s6 b  iAnswer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header). T: r$ \) N2 V* v3 M+ |
; T1 B% |( a# B5 {7 x
3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links: y/ z& O3 U2 n( f# h: S2 n
mtu size with ping command?
* a2 n/ W) [% ]6 C9 f+ LA- ping 10.1.1.1 size 15014 L4 b& D/ e% O" M: l2 ^/ [3 l' e
B- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit
' o3 P1 ~  {2 NC- ???4 A$ M: E4 r  Y) M. S4 |. t
D- ???
5 D2 {4 d$ Z; M5 |) DAnswer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping)- {- h, X  _5 _4 {: h( C: x
' C* N- U- V" o) L6 K( i* v3 Z3 O
4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (( w* V+ i7 A$ l( b5 Z  B* {
Topology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination); D2 T" D( Y; d- z( ?8 _
A- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down
* K: |2 f% X# TB- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)
% u4 T1 O, Q  C, ZC- ???: q& J; {' Y. Q- k4 J) U
D- ???
; C0 B, M/ E. {0 c; m/ Canswer: AB% E. ?9 R6 S  U

6 r6 @) |/ M1 e2 Y! x& S0 H" @5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)
& f5 g; [) ]5 T- z$ f- c(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the
! r( e  Z9 ^) w7 mother FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes). R1 v. t' k9 R- z2 ^; W, U/ ~/ O; t
A- they are not neighs (wrong)
9 l6 z' r8 p/ `& ]B- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R21 x2 m$ n0 \+ z  d; j- D8 B; ~
C- ???$ M7 p) ]8 M: ]) m' |
D- ???
) a$ s- }* m  B+ }1 Y/ mE- ???
+ s9 m- D" o0 B) |Answer: B e ???1 X' U, I) ^; i
Note:
4 h0 Q4 a. n; C1 u7 Q@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,
6 a" j$ s+ c# ]NBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.
, B+ {9 }: p, A7 K% v* y' |The routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.
' e4 s/ e0 L% y  K, _@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that
; ?4 i, S5 O  Z! N' h' @& d6 Fshows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.
5 w# E. @2 [; Q6 o: q. Q. l$ _
" o. _' S$ Q7 g6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established3 @* a1 s# B1 F  o2 k
the admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the- ^! S1 g* I. F! x) H$ ?9 [
adjacency dropped. What is the reason?$ g* A( d# D( _" X
(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)
; d. }5 g: B$ _- HA- MTU mismatch2 E. `- a! U/ f$ f& E5 Z, D! |
B- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)8 V/ t. l8 \) t' v0 @3 Z
C-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel+ D# y+ m9 m# U  \  p( b0 ^, K
>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer,
; T8 _, w: ]5 ~$ T: E4 Obecause the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,. D: E7 _9 q# W: ?6 {$ k1 W, K
otherwise would cause Recursive Routing.& I# p* W4 \+ T9 ~' s
D-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”
# |) ^+ F3 S# O3 [>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,/ M4 @4 W0 h; T5 r, I
add network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.3 s$ i0 J( x/ {& z1 G8 f
Answer: D ???
2 j- N: E2 U4 T3 P7 jsomeone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:
7 g* M, [% L$ N6 C9 TOSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel/ R1 v! A( f% a: _- g9 v8 p1 e5 R

. D7 U% o6 m" DTickets! x6 B: Q5 d2 C, f# M% S
Ticket – R1 – IP NAT% J9 J! V" ^. z$ x: c, M. e5 O
This ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.
# l/ G: m+ _# l2 V% o6 V: HThe fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network' I0 m2 A: [/ \0 ^$ H
is configured with “NAT outside”.
8 u% T, ?9 w7 p+ }$ iTo correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”! S. c& U2 f$ q
2 H5 X) E3 Z+ N9 J8 m. t
Ticket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP- O0 V! _& i3 v3 I
OSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp
85# 2017-6-3 02:19:49 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

DT1640759
发表于 2017-6-3 02:20:29 | 显示全部楼层
MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details
- K0 H: m3 t5 K
: m: ]; S8 k( G7 C3 M0 A1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?& C* y$ a9 i0 Q4 Y
(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)
( J4 f: z3 N1 S% HA- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2
9 c, C4 ^8 {$ `) Q. ddebug ppp authentication# \8 s- A, F* x1 E, E
B- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2
' N8 ]& }( `* v3 g$ k% S% p: Xdebug ppp authentication
* ?, i2 ?, g8 x( nC- debug int s0/1
/ l& r4 \( h4 U9 p6 n8 Y4 z' `debug int 0/2
  L- |& d' L& c/ I) F. Bdebug ppp authentication
( \: K8 ]. C" H6 l( e  ?D- debug condition interface FIRST
, l. i7 `" g! Udebug condition interface SECOND
* T/ b& k/ ?$ L# `! h5 zdebug ppp authenication9 Q" v6 ^; b3 q' y

  C' i4 `$ Q8 D$ j8 B- q( WAnswer: D? or C5 p( W9 q; i5 x7 k
Explanation:
( w2 \* P5 f: k& A0 l4 E5 PLink:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html
1 ]' g. _) D/ i- O/ A6 p! l: x! h+ _- v
2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)9 h$ J; O  L2 G% p0 W
Answer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)5 m4 c, d) j# v/ A( t& t1 J
: K7 y) M, V2 w5 R* v1 t1 Y
3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links' x% X2 G  x( S' W, C5 ^
mtu size with ping command?
  n5 f0 Q& I" J3 EA- ping 10.1.1.1 size 15017 G* U/ V% {5 C0 _% w; h
B- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit, J' R: F  Q! j6 S2 i
C- ???
8 U( U# E+ V. Y( o9 \) M. RD- ???. O1 j1 n. ~- v$ F. q( _: b" [
Answer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping)" l& [  c: b- p) O1 X
$ X- \' @" {+ {- U& B. z& S$ X" [) p3 j
4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (
* s' U' {: ^# i" `9 [% rTopology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)- S% L8 q+ |# x1 T) K& k/ K1 H
A- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down$ s3 K& M4 C6 J* p& F& r
B- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)
! P6 e5 q$ t- v2 t; uC- ???8 |: k3 u4 L9 Y
D- ???9 r" I  P. G1 C
answer: AB
$ ]0 q9 P, A" A) ]+ y! i4 o* E0 |. Y! J, D6 y' r1 c8 Z" i; j
5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)$ M! U% w0 o* Q% U
(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the6 P& ^/ [' n7 i* X' P; ?. Y( U# o
other FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes)$ [5 G1 y9 K- D5 I) x
A- they are not neighs (wrong)! @. F2 H. p5 y- I8 I4 {
B- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R2" r. G2 X" L4 \: ~6 d
C- ???& ^  m& \: t7 M6 L8 Q3 q
D- ???
# \: I6 \3 Q! [% b' T* hE- ???. w- \" S& w/ U) O
Answer: B e ???% N% ^$ ]% N  a3 f5 p
Note:
6 _% G: m4 p" e2 P# Q1 x$ @  M@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,: o8 b6 o/ x, R0 C
NBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.9 f" w! |" I: U% I! T" a
The routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.
5 z* N% j7 s0 j7 {% ^: X@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that. Z6 f5 M; k$ C& W+ A2 o3 y
shows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.+ S3 I+ g4 I2 D
2 V9 r; d$ c& w3 Z' K
6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established" {& \4 l( o, x4 a* V
the admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
* y- |$ P' w0 L  g+ iadjacency dropped. What is the reason?' N4 Q' F. ^0 C. U. x
(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)
1 v9 U( M0 W) d( U- eA- MTU mismatch9 O' c, _. q& o9 \" n$ N6 `1 ^6 P
B- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)
* x! a, e, p7 m( f" K. B2 b% cC-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel' [  c' Q% V: |
>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer,2 Q+ _3 \5 ^4 M: m9 v7 N- I5 |6 q
because the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,- J7 L2 b; T$ E4 C+ k% h0 ?5 d
otherwise would cause Recursive Routing.8 o6 s' v( a; v4 @
D-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”7 t$ I7 J! c3 u% ]: D
>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,/ S% }1 X* U% Z! i6 y" y* }
add network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.
; b# m) V. \# s, zAnswer: D ???
! a! A: l6 R( _" qsomeone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:
1 i! \# t4 ?* ^' O1 ]0 oOSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel  [: [0 S: m) Q( Q7 C& b  N
, R5 e, C& {6 B# p" [$ D" y
Tickets
/ z' z& Q& w* q3 n5 j" {) Q8 L2 [Ticket – R1 – IP NAT: j6 e. F  r$ B0 X
This ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.
$ _, z* G2 [& w; L* \1 \! Y, c( yThe fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network4 p7 E& H! l7 [& m, o+ v  D
is configured with “NAT outside”.4 j& h9 R% S# Y2 W% p0 }
To correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”- _+ s8 R+ C- W% O

* D0 ]0 i4 T0 d6 j& dTicket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP
" V  S! n8 m9 q: r8 x# W- `OSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp
86# 2017-6-3 02:20:29 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

DT1640759
发表于 2017-6-3 02:23:38 | 显示全部楼层
MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details
$ S1 }" f9 j" x3 a5 s1 E2 e' t
# i* g+ v# X" R2 H1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?; X% s  i( x/ }: v# O3 K
(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)3 Z  v. U; Z3 \- U8 q
A- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2
+ ]( g  p) o. o, Adebug ppp authentication
% S! v! U& P2 ~B- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2: \$ H2 q* z# q% V2 U2 I
debug ppp authentication( X# w  a2 t( Q# Q; X& x
C- debug int s0/1' M/ d* w5 c! s7 {% f" H
debug int 0/2( V) v3 {/ K. N( a, d
debug ppp authentication) G3 b5 Z! l2 y6 C& A$ i
D- debug condition interface FIRST
( j6 O3 c" W6 U! o5 E. c1 t: Udebug condition interface SECOND( s3 y, `7 c8 @* `9 t
debug ppp authenication- O1 }2 m) w3 H9 L) R

' {5 @. C1 B2 Z7 q0 _Answer: D? or C
& Q; b* ]. f: s& eExplanation:
4 l# b5 t3 j$ m5 X" cLink:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html7 P) R. E: E$ }9 c! W' J+ [( Y2 r
( n9 t! w* F8 {5 [5 a
2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)
0 f" m+ T4 n% j8 ?5 wAnswer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)8 s$ q! o! ], w$ H  i/ O" b+ R) D0 |, L
% a: h( z+ T# S% ?3 s& x4 H
3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links& I# m" w, `2 L
mtu size with ping command?
2 m. `1 X5 _7 k2 h; zA- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1501
8 h) U1 n8 r$ t9 g0 x9 [B- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit9 P$ h% Q3 S( E, s: Q+ R
C- ???+ y$ S0 e! V1 D9 @/ z
D- ???
  r  p) A9 X7 H9 C7 Y! y! PAnswer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping)
3 E$ q& c) t0 ~5 M) k, `- F5 x3 X: N% R
+ h3 k5 x5 i4 X* f  _: F; [& ]9 @4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (
- w* s3 q$ k5 x& ~( v% z/ j! iTopology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)
& t3 s: }: A1 e5 W% X% f2 v7 D  KA- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down
( L, _0 C/ a7 F$ ZB- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)1 L1 L& V) S- f" K' q
C- ???
! H# X; g8 a) Z! {& LD- ???
. @/ T$ z4 j4 |* u& ?. f1 `answer: AB
. q0 Y# G+ B, ]  x' j) k% _# H" y
5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)7 O( x7 ]) R* g
(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the; t0 z7 k# h7 [. _7 L! x% C6 A
other FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes), C4 k# ?. o# r9 b5 o0 L+ @
A- they are not neighs (wrong)- z/ e+ D7 g3 O, v6 q7 @0 V( W
B- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R25 m- Y1 k8 m3 W* n1 B
C- ???
/ j! S  j+ R" Z1 J+ DD- ???
4 `6 e( [# U! a3 _( AE- ???8 u6 t+ Y, o+ |& {7 H: M- n& T
Answer: B e ???# p2 X5 N1 {, a/ q5 x
Note:
2 w. S0 Q* R# B+ I8 H7 O* j- o@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,
2 u8 O+ f, D- D( z7 Q- J/ |: o3 aNBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.
& w4 |- [+ M: B# UThe routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.& D% S1 H! ]- T/ B9 \' C7 @
@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that2 m& r8 I+ ?; t  N1 I- M7 N
shows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.! ]* K5 K% `+ Z) W$ @
) O6 z5 r* \6 w/ i0 B* m0 C
6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established
  I* |& ^1 D; c; s1 \the admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
/ ?5 Y1 b' q* M, P/ X  padjacency dropped. What is the reason?( a% k' K2 ]/ w+ F1 M; w
(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)$ K5 u/ W! R" E9 _0 x+ E
A- MTU mismatch
: F. \  v3 Q9 yB- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)% o/ v, i" s: W* k, n) D
C-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel0 d3 j9 r  x) V0 ^, [9 X
>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer,
. v- M4 m& {+ O# c) Pbecause the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,% J4 j2 ~" S( r. p+ y
otherwise would cause Recursive Routing.8 H/ v4 |  V0 ]7 a3 {& G
D-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”* u; N, [" R2 i
>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,
- L6 `! ?  ^( t, u$ k  n5 _add network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.
- K3 Y1 m2 [* ^  @Answer: D ???
( w# V: r5 Y9 }9 tsomeone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:* s+ A& S/ K* S  i; Y& Y
OSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel
- O* z+ Z( h3 L' y
$ z3 `8 v, o: q& c8 _( ~* q- b/ l1 [$ qTickets, n$ W: C1 G6 I  X
Ticket – R1 – IP NAT/ _( r4 b, ^3 a. C# M8 J, A
This ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.
& E  i# x+ s% }! n0 \7 _9 dThe fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network) p' i2 h' u( t) l
is configured with “NAT outside”.
' A+ v. z/ v( f& ^To correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”
' s* m4 d' o: ^2 l- b$ o  C
- X; y- Q3 c* c# o* fTicket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP! i  I! T, l, ^: V6 d. t5 q% g9 Z' }
OSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp
87# 2017-6-3 02:23:38 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

tetra8888
发表于 2017-6-3 06:24:42 | 显示全部楼层
thank you for sharing
88# 2017-6-3 06:24:42 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

下一页 »
12345678910... 13下一页
返回列表 发新帖
高级模式
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 论坛注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|sitemap|鸿鹄论坛 ( 京ICP备14027439号 )  

GMT+8, 2025-4-30 04:13 , Processed in 0.216420 second(s), 20 queries , Redis On.  

  Powered by Discuz!

  © 2001-2025 HH010.COM

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表