|
发表于 2017-6-3 11:13:41
|
显示全部楼层
MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details , }7 e) }' H4 C& S
* I+ A, ~3 m1 v+ m( v1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?
2 }8 z9 ~8 q! b6 n0 H! _7 K(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)( K3 J0 Q- K2 G4 Z3 q
A- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/28 W* I" T2 i. V5 c: R
debug ppp authentication- O4 t4 N' {5 \( s5 A# g
B- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2
: t8 g; f5 L0 u+ I1 Ldebug ppp authentication
+ l! K5 O, ~9 B" k+ \- N( HC- debug int s0/1
, d" Q) ^) K( W, G: s3 ?6 edebug int 0/2
* t5 E+ h q2 }, kdebug ppp authentication
4 \( n) G/ |+ P' G, S; DD- debug condition interface FIRST2 Q- B) F/ V1 ?& h1 Z: T
debug condition interface SECOND: P4 l3 T- E! x: N v
debug ppp authenication
* ^# N3 G' h% B: i7 V9 V/ A7 ^2 \6 g% p0 U
Answer: D? or C
) c) n2 T v/ r E: @5 ZExplanation:5 f% B1 V$ ^$ U3 q; a
Link:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html
+ d7 t- W* j4 V; }
$ x& F: ^* ?6 b1 y8 U2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)
" j% G1 V' i6 h3 XAnswer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)3 ]5 O6 N: ]6 i5 P, a2 y8 S
& F; ]( w7 E% x$ e- p/ \3 @
3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links
& W# p! `: }1 Y% _4 f& l9 \mtu size with ping command?. w2 T- w+ F6 |) m
A- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1501& D/ s+ R9 R; V, [! H
B- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit
8 G }4 @7 j0 |C- ???: ^# I' z, R7 P& \0 a. n
D- ???
6 U! d+ K$ \5 W! @) Q, s- w* b6 X. UAnswer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping) M* \$ z l. i* t- t2 Y
- h9 E+ o6 k4 X% e
4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (
* a! a% J% Q x( y- E$ j3 kTopology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)' \. }- {* \0 i8 Q/ B. O# }! b8 u2 f
A- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down
- f6 u5 v" d, Z3 Z/ {6 lB- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)
' A4 a7 f9 {" R A7 @C- ???& G+ {9 w' {* N3 e' M! l ^( @
D- ???2 @; f2 A0 `6 k4 [
answer: AB
: [, f6 g+ A( J3 h) U3 \4 C# Y4 ^
8 ^$ r1 N- `% A7 Z9 {- c1 D5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)
, U& S5 o2 O: [4 p1 s- ~(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the, j2 A1 Z* b1 Q/ S$ k8 y
other FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes)
5 \+ o) Y- l( A4 p; v+ SA- they are not neighs (wrong)
5 m6 k- u5 V3 `4 m2 jB- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R2
. B# F, M- d7 ^C- ???
; b1 t4 I! |! ?, y" }0 Q8 d1 xD- ???
m. t9 G, ~) U9 f8 UE- ???, G" w# `! C$ z" M$ n7 B: U' R: |
Answer: B e ???
& r( t* R6 }+ F/ q9 BNote:% W) p) c7 Q" V: Z8 ~5 ]3 Q) V
@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,
2 B/ c( k! b- T2 h2 sNBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.
5 J+ B' a9 e) L6 _6 _" _The routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.
' Q- p( R# Z! e$ L! B2 k! K4 e! w3 r@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that
- Q6 E# ~2 T4 I" ~5 z: Q" L; {shows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.. I1 d W: {1 ^% {# ^
1 l8 z# O$ \+ `6 u5 j3 F4 [3 v: s3 G& r
6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established6 ?0 A, P2 F: k, l; m
the admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
" h9 _& @+ A& t+ Nadjacency dropped. What is the reason?/ Y1 {6 S3 {4 ~$ ?) D% e e1 v
(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)
# M" S- ?- ]- i0 CA- MTU mismatch
0 w8 J, w6 \+ Q/ ]B- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)
: D/ x: h6 ^ uC-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel, {/ U" D+ F6 J: X: Y7 ?
>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer," n; i! R' o( a- C1 d5 B/ p+ y
because the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,
4 ~2 G- g' A9 B9 u2 @" ]8 c& Rotherwise would cause Recursive Routing.
3 D5 x4 Z% d0 c Y( nD-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”
5 f/ e! }9 P! `: b* u3 ?3 }4 S/ a>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,8 a: Y! k) e9 w6 ^) K$ V
add network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.8 g6 }/ ]) M- p$ U
Answer: D ???8 S6 `5 H: \* v4 e$ K+ q5 O
someone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:- }& s- X/ J8 G0 I: T& I
OSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel
7 {# J7 y. Z- s# a+ ^% v. p2 F
6 a, ?- X* h4 J2 Z r! L @Tickets
* k9 }0 u; w. T: vTicket – R1 – IP NAT
4 A8 j+ Y% I- _This ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list." @, l& f5 n9 u# A m* ?" Y" l/ W' ~
The fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network
+ u" A% q& F6 ]. v& jis configured with “NAT outside”.
' K/ J+ Z) _, G( H: p3 X2 E* B: bTo correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”
4 W8 X4 b/ \0 t% g9 U; Y: L p% w% H2 T( O8 _4 B7 o
Ticket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP
S3 o9 h. @1 f1 M7 B- ^; pOSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp |
101#
2017-6-3 11:13:41
回复(0)
收起回复
|