设为首页收藏本站language 语言切换
楼主: 小乔
收起左侧

[考试战报] CCNP排错(300-135)考试新题(6月2日更新)

  [复制链接]
发表于 2017-6-2 18:11:03 | 显示全部楼层
感谢楼主分享!
77# 2017-6-2 18:11:03 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-6-2 21:24:16 | 显示全部楼层
请乔帮主,多点搜集最近更新的300-135,6月份好多考友在排左队要考呢
80# 2017-6-2 21:24:16 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-6-2 21:59:24 | 显示全部楼层
thanks a lot !
82# 2017-6-2 21:59:24 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-6-3 01:09:30 | 显示全部楼层
一定要回贴,因为我是文明人哦  X4 S8 J( T2 N) `* o7 @0 P
84# 2017-6-3 01:09:30 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-6-3 02:19:49 | 显示全部楼层
MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details % F( n8 |! h% Q

9 p" {9 p0 `1 M% a' Z1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?
6 w7 k8 T3 ^) v5 M(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)
. q8 s6 F  H) |# h$ j0 F4 l) JA- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2! |1 P/ s! Q6 a1 N
debug ppp authentication
! D. p" e: o1 WB- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2
2 f" s9 g4 u' w' I  `debug ppp authentication
# H6 d: E. h& TC- debug int s0/16 W' M4 q9 {7 H0 E
debug int 0/2
- W' `2 `2 A2 ydebug ppp authentication# |4 i' D  \% U7 ]% R* v2 l
D- debug condition interface FIRST7 m# {  D  z5 [
debug condition interface SECOND: Z6 j8 C1 K5 I5 }  t
debug ppp authenication9 a8 K& P3 v& A, P7 z# V/ F2 U3 a
' W" h; J* U3 X/ Y9 W6 z* N# Q$ I
Answer: D? or C
: E( A0 A6 o8 EExplanation:, O: J! J* X; I* d
Link:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html
4 D, b* I! }% T# N* h5 U8 B9 c% ^4 J! e3 N% K4 U- H
2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)
* L8 ?! Q. V2 HAnswer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)
$ g$ ?6 o' M6 B6 B2 [
, x1 Q) b& q9 I0 ?$ Q$ w3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links6 }+ t9 L# T+ w% ]" a
mtu size with ping command?
& |, ~0 i' K, ~A- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1501
7 s: l3 U* Z* C0 v: k3 I3 FB- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit
# b( z  D* v% e! o6 OC- ???
8 U2 w6 D5 O5 H  S7 H7 \  ?D- ???
: @6 c6 Q3 p8 A3 m0 J* `! xAnswer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping)9 C. \, J; j- X9 U! e
7 r+ Y7 V2 D' [( n
4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (
# f2 r+ H2 ^- a1 z' H% zTopology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)0 O. A5 I# Q  B: A7 z
A- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down6 p1 [. V# v0 }/ A) ~9 q# i: y5 n8 i
B- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)2 B7 c! U% v" m: v4 f9 v
C- ???
& F8 k- ^; C* ^" q$ y7 bD- ???
5 W8 D- _. J! W, b4 C( Sanswer: AB: i6 L- |5 T8 W" e! C! X( e9 F. M

8 G2 c  y  K( P+ p, n' u; S5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two). a; v0 I# `. U: r
(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the
$ ?) F3 z% C3 P1 h2 j1 F4 fother FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes)9 u+ T5 p. k( w: ?1 D. z+ _. u
A- they are not neighs (wrong)
+ z* u" |9 W: _' h4 J* cB- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R2
! ~! Y6 i4 O) F2 C7 |7 wC- ???  C4 F% N" B+ R6 t' M8 P
D- ???+ e" F; t3 |! e* F2 n
E- ???
$ ^: n" h: Q) WAnswer: B e ???7 Y+ d- n0 O+ u3 ^3 m% ~- V
Note:
' H& l1 k+ A6 f1 }8 O@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,) {) l6 |  x* _0 u" ^5 v
NBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.
$ _( `0 l5 C) KThe routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.
( i: f+ l  d' }  H( s9 f@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that6 n; ?: j3 r' k5 R+ G0 n
shows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.
9 a7 q4 H! n, p! d* W$ \) q, {& v- w7 {# B9 |" E9 H! H" {
6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established
7 E  B5 s8 [, R4 }( v0 Q5 H% o0 d5 }the admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
) l1 G/ F4 z* o& h; K) xadjacency dropped. What is the reason?
  k0 J( N/ q3 y4 B( a8 r: V(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)% z! J5 q2 V3 |
A- MTU mismatch! y  W; c0 h5 V( ?  B
B- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)' e: p- q' t. o8 w+ d7 Z: [
C-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel# y+ B3 J( [1 {/ D1 p
>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer,0 F9 u: w! E9 C. O1 `- D
because the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,1 [! n8 r# A0 M: g7 x' h
otherwise would cause Recursive Routing./ r- _) [% K; {) _
D-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”
- w; \  x" h1 Q# x" f. _! s9 o; v>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,
6 c, |8 Y. r) U' S, C$ dadd network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.
. A& F: N4 r; x( {Answer: D ???
1 |+ N5 g) n/ s9 j6 ysomeone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:- i8 M7 N2 P' z$ Y0 j9 g
OSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel
# [. F% S8 [8 [) n) p7 h& X' }0 v: D& ~  H0 F( l) X
Tickets- z2 N# x) a4 G# `
Ticket – R1 – IP NAT6 \  ]: q. z' A- m5 L7 k9 ]+ D9 l
This ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.
# R1 x  Y) E% K! E& x. MThe fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network
3 b, [' }& e3 zis configured with “NAT outside”.
: B6 M7 ]; q9 d$ w6 fTo correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”
2 F. s' n: u6 W, Q4 v$ e" j' a' s  x' i* E8 E- s; E. n
Ticket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP& i: Q2 j0 a+ B# E- K
OSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp
85# 2017-6-3 02:19:49 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-6-3 02:20:29 | 显示全部楼层
MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details % q7 X$ b6 q4 I6 P( q5 G% c

( E7 L" A9 p, J) ]' s( t( Z1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?' p% B: d. s( ~
(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)2 Z/ ], j" Q1 [: E% o3 e" L( A' h
A- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2$ \$ k4 }8 j$ Z2 o
debug ppp authentication) i" |. I2 u1 B6 P. o! ?, |
B- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2
6 }: U# u! V1 Z% Rdebug ppp authentication
) z/ [( r' f6 U) MC- debug int s0/1
# b: g0 y7 g- _, e% R. Gdebug int 0/2" [5 m4 c! [4 L8 E2 J: r$ u, W
debug ppp authentication- ^$ q$ A  |" k
D- debug condition interface FIRST9 a7 h$ }$ j1 e; o
debug condition interface SECOND
4 v9 ]" ~: u# L( s+ a) Gdebug ppp authenication
7 V* {# E1 j! x% g% l+ A# q3 w$ I3 S. p# ~; g( [9 s
Answer: D? or C" k) X! U: T5 r' E8 T) W
Explanation:1 A3 ?& v4 R: n; H
Link:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html( M* Q( U7 i9 J3 u
' Z  J6 ~8 n: f0 ], t2 t* ~
2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)) m) e$ H6 R* K/ c
Answer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)$ X! ~( Q5 b0 b: ]6 T
2 j8 V- _0 O1 E) l+ d4 ]
3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links9 G) j3 L) A! c% H
mtu size with ping command?$ w$ s- y1 H) D/ {. z
A- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1501
# G' D0 @# e  T6 r; oB- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit
/ {7 ~+ k5 U9 C" w; VC- ???4 H/ |) |' l) x$ a' ?' w
D- ???( g% ^* V; }  W& Z# Q2 T
Answer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping)' u; J- J0 R* \: i

! v& N$ V' R/ Y& }: g4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (
0 l+ ]. q- ~4 B" S6 ITopology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)
' Q: S( I: n7 M% jA- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down$ x4 Q/ ^8 K, Y$ S3 y
B- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)2 N" q5 }2 r! _$ B% t9 e& h
C- ???
$ ]. c- z& X/ e# mD- ???7 P( L! w9 f* G0 p" {3 E' t1 P
answer: AB
8 N# u) v6 b: B2 F' v5 Q" i6 |# v* M( F. J( [0 ~0 n
5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)
+ N6 d, {; F5 h% v# _2 D8 [( C* s(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the
. I: Q# a* j; r4 ]: yother FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes)
4 i5 W# ?% v4 z: ^0 YA- they are not neighs (wrong): k, Y4 ?" d) U/ c; r
B- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R2
+ \' R: m+ T. W6 J2 t( |) C, hC- ???+ r5 C3 @% U4 s1 m6 @
D- ???
- d( a- M/ o( TE- ???
- r. D0 O2 U; J- OAnswer: B e ???; z7 n$ G" t. w& M5 z
Note:2 e# U0 Q% j2 I" E& Y  N# t
@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,! u2 ^" B3 R, W3 ~6 y
NBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.
$ }: g# `3 d5 U- B( uThe routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.
8 f% `7 B; i8 {  L5 z7 A+ E4 }@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that
, k- ~5 x% m1 h+ xshows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.# h% j; s" y5 c$ P

" K2 c& y  h/ o( e. G' |6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established7 i9 Z# b1 s$ J2 j' H
the admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
) a8 }% k+ J  k& h& o* G+ padjacency dropped. What is the reason?
9 W  I7 h" b8 t(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)/ k5 b( C( K; Q
A- MTU mismatch6 b9 V: G& g7 X8 F$ A
B- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)
- p, ?% k$ n! j6 @C-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel
" R" F, {$ A5 o/ M, s" @>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer,6 X& Z0 D1 q6 {
because the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,# l3 x0 Y4 @2 o
otherwise would cause Recursive Routing.% @( C# b2 f4 f$ v( I
D-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”2 h( H# [$ ]( p
>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,
; f; K8 j0 X; ^% \. {6 x# r7 q1 Iadd network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.
* a! a6 @* U' r' FAnswer: D ???
: `! F/ F9 S+ b9 q8 e% D, nsomeone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:
+ I1 ~7 U! U1 y7 MOSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel) h: A* }8 [; ?  f
+ S: p7 U& |6 J
Tickets
* M, n* F6 ^2 C' w6 c7 oTicket – R1 – IP NAT
: f# I, i' V7 B- X7 p. J3 m/ A/ [This ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.( I8 F1 c1 `, g- A* m) o
The fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network
# P$ I3 L4 ]4 x* Sis configured with “NAT outside”.6 U% f1 G1 {/ Y# s7 h. x
To correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”
+ q; L/ J2 Z8 t6 p5 K# f8 u* \4 {) v+ T
Ticket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP
% q! N, f. U- a6 p% {OSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp
86# 2017-6-3 02:20:29 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-6-3 02:23:38 | 显示全部楼层
MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details
2 U$ Z# c/ T: |! R2 ^
) `* z  G# H; c$ g" E) b1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?
& Y+ a" `; R  s3 s* P+ M. E(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)- ]0 s  I/ j( y9 u- T: I$ ^8 Y
A- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2
+ A& s% [$ H- wdebug ppp authentication
) L" R" G4 E0 ], m  P& KB- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2
* L! n; [& C7 u, d# Z9 ~% g8 G3 k) xdebug ppp authentication9 x4 U6 J$ l4 ?. V9 m: L
C- debug int s0/1
4 z1 }! {4 D4 x, Y$ L# D+ vdebug int 0/27 |& x+ Z6 l, S4 E' s9 K
debug ppp authentication$ c( F2 z6 Z3 P& D2 V0 I8 W
D- debug condition interface FIRST2 h( D/ U/ b5 A8 B9 g- j4 h
debug condition interface SECOND$ e( O6 `  l$ a- {. o+ H
debug ppp authenication. D  E9 f2 Y$ T% x
1 S- E# ?! V. r6 x) t
Answer: D? or C1 B; |/ O8 U, }* ~! z# W3 V) e
Explanation:
' X. K8 Z( M+ D8 ]Link:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html
/ h5 T/ C. P. _9 }
" N+ a$ c8 `+ T) A- d4 K4 h2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)- j. r1 K/ L3 i. K' j7 c
Answer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)
: ~2 {$ W5 |, H( @
2 B7 o( e; }( a. e7 u3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links3 m% v: @4 t9 Q+ c; V& M
mtu size with ping command?
. w6 R+ C' h9 y# x$ x7 x3 A( zA- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1501
$ {, r) `8 G% PB- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit: q/ j( \# P6 D, g0 o1 `6 ^
C- ???  Y* ?# I0 T, X' z/ x% E
D- ???
: I' {! i# i0 S6 B% HAnswer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping)
' B' s! I5 R+ w6 a5 A) v9 x6 m& F3 e6 c% v* P8 B  g
4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (. ^6 l+ b, Q- S7 a6 x
Topology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)- M0 W7 J2 ?+ x& R5 P0 Q' k! k
A- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down3 E/ L: Q( l& @1 |2 v- r2 T( K+ U+ A
B- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)
/ H2 p+ ]! @( h) e) \: xC- ???( ~9 ?7 }. f; _5 p' j1 M
D- ???
8 O+ S+ |/ X5 r( |answer: AB. N7 I9 d1 @+ [
( U& \1 k& R7 I2 g6 y( f6 |& H; M% k5 x
5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)# e4 A/ y2 W# T+ @% c: x( x& a
(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the, b% s/ C1 l$ z2 @: a4 X/ {& s* K# j
other FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes)' |4 I5 X* O: ?: x3 D% a- O3 r0 E
A- they are not neighs (wrong)$ V1 T9 q1 Y5 e0 v1 S
B- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R2( K) O) `# t1 b7 i
C- ???
' B0 v5 L0 U  n! S7 a+ M- VD- ???
9 k& H4 p3 q5 g8 J  e2 M! aE- ???
) @# c5 c! {0 t. V  |' u0 JAnswer: B e ???
9 r9 f, l9 @5 M: P" \Note:, L3 h# `! Z( O
@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,
6 a0 o* n0 J' Y& [. GNBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.& F6 j4 ^* D% ?& l# _9 a7 i
The routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.  w% x+ c- W! D5 E" h# r9 U
@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that9 Z9 W1 e0 m* v  v0 L) K
shows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.
7 ]! ]" z/ i% Z( y3 N" G. w) p1 ?$ f6 a
6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established5 X/ z. A4 x" ?+ B6 [. ?: g0 n, k
the admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
( K6 l8 q1 x( P# w. Kadjacency dropped. What is the reason?
+ s3 a8 _1 i0 l2 D) {/ h# Z(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)
3 S  R: T: V6 b% J6 W& qA- MTU mismatch
* R7 F8 g& T7 X& jB- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)
( z4 _9 K! A' @. [. U% DC-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel
7 M5 X  S/ Q% g2 Y3 E>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer," A$ y! ?7 M8 ?  p1 J8 D2 g
because the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,
: J7 k  i2 O! T. ^$ a8 K3 dotherwise would cause Recursive Routing.
; G- h% ~1 h( m0 o6 J* c$ [0 f1 e3 OD-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”
/ g0 [. y( T6 d: w>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,9 }4 F9 x0 F4 Y6 C7 x' {* A2 u9 e- ]
add network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.
! c: k- z' ^9 K* dAnswer: D ???
( U4 ~7 u1 c1 p, b- ~someone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:
: Y, S# I6 }9 xOSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel
( A& _7 ?" w7 n1 I7 Y6 D# V& u1 z
Tickets
0 m8 Y5 O9 B" T1 d2 ^Ticket – R1 – IP NAT% J# p1 K& h& z1 c1 Z
This ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.
& `; `* i- X. @% VThe fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network
: D; p/ B! o& Y, K2 q, ^is configured with “NAT outside”.: W# n* C' Y/ Q5 S" g& `& V  D
To correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”3 q* |- e. d; _' h2 g
+ ?: u' x) b6 ]) n) v/ F( E: ?
Ticket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP
* E6 g9 I/ i5 ^1 a/ b. z- bOSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp
87# 2017-6-3 02:23:38 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2017-6-3 06:24:42 | 显示全部楼层
thank you for sharing
88# 2017-6-3 06:24:42 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 论坛注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|sitemap|鸿鹄论坛 ( 京ICP备14027439号 )  

GMT+8, 2025-5-13 18:19 , Processed in 0.062917 second(s), 20 queries , Redis On.  

  Powered by Discuz!

  © 2001-2025 HH010.COM

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表