|
发表于 2017-6-3 02:20:29
|
显示全部楼层
MCQ questions SUMMARY – still need Q5 and both SIM details % q7 X$ b6 q4 I6 P( q5 G% c
( E7 L" A9 p, J) ]' s( t( Z1- Which command will limit debug output ppp authentication on serial 0/1 and serial 0/2?' p% B: d. s( ~
(Limit debug ppp authentication to 2 interfaces)2 Z/ ], j" Q1 [: E% o3 e" L( A' h
A- debug condition interface range s0/1 -0/2$ \$ k4 }8 j$ Z2 o
debug ppp authentication) i" |. I2 u1 B6 P. o! ?, |
B- debug condition interface s0/1 & 0/2
6 }: U# u! V1 Z% Rdebug ppp authentication
) z/ [( r' f6 U) MC- debug int s0/1
# b: g0 y7 g- _, e% R. Gdebug int 0/2" [5 m4 c! [4 L8 E2 J: r$ u, W
debug ppp authentication- ^$ q$ A |" k
D- debug condition interface FIRST9 a7 h$ }$ j1 e; o
debug condition interface SECOND
4 v9 ]" ~: u# L( s+ a) Gdebug ppp authenication
7 V* {# E1 j! x% g% l+ A# q3 w$ I3 S. p# ~; g( [9 s
Answer: D? or C" k) X! U: T5 r' E8 T) W
Explanation:1 A3 ?& v4 R: n; H
Link:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/ ... debug/dbfcndtr.html( M* Q( U7 i9 J3 u
' Z J6 ~8 n: f0 ], t2 t* ~
2- What is the MTU’s size in a GRE tunnel? (Max size of GRE tunnel)) m) e$ H6 R* K/ c
Answer: 1476 (20 bytes IP + 4 bytes MINIMUM GRE header)$ X! ~( Q5 b0 b: ]6 T
2 j8 V- _0 O1 E) l+ d4 ]
3- How to check MTU of interface using ping? / How can you check the links9 G) j3 L) A! c% H
mtu size with ping command?$ w$ s- y1 H) D/ {. z
A- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1501
# G' D0 @# e T6 r; oB- ping 10.1.1.1 size 1500 df-bit
/ {7 ~+ k5 U9 C" w; VC- ???4 H/ |) |' l) x$ a' ?' w
D- ???( g% ^* V; } W& Z# Q2 T
Answer: B (You have to use df-bit option on ping)' u; J- J0 R* \: i
! v& N$ V' R/ Y& }: g4- The tunnel between R1 and R3 is not coming up. Which two statements are true? (choose two) (
0 l+ ]. q- ~4 B" S6 ITopology with a GRE tunnel and the outputs provided are show ip int brief and tunnel source and destination)
' Q: S( I: n7 M% jA- tunnel source int Eth0/0 is down$ x4 Q/ ^8 K, Y$ S3 y
B- no route from R1 to R3 loopback0 (tunnel destination)2 N" q5 }2 r! _$ B% t9 e& h
C- ???
$ ]. c- z& X/ e# mD- ???7 P( L! w9 f* G0 p" {3 E' t1 P
answer: AB
8 N# u) v6 b: B2 F' v5 Q" i6 |# v* M( F. J( [0 ~0 n
5- R1 and R2 OSPF neighbor. Which two statements are true? (choose two)
+ N6 d, {; F5 h% v# _2 D8 [( C* s(Output from show ip ospf neighbours on 2 routers, one of them shows FULL/DR, the
. I: Q# a* j; r4 ]: yother FULL/-, you need to know how were they configured and will they exchange routes)
4 i5 W# ?% v4 z: ^0 YA- they are not neighs (wrong): k, Y4 ?" d) U/ c; r
B- R1(non-DR) will not update its routes to R2
+ \' R: m+ T. W6 J2 t( |) C, hC- ???+ r5 C3 @% U4 s1 m6 @
D- ???
- d( a- M/ o( TE- ???
- r. D0 O2 U; J- OAnswer: B e ???; z7 n$ G" t. w& M5 z
Note:2 e# U0 Q% j2 I" E& Y N# t
@Tamelir: This is the case when router has configured network that selects DR – broadcast,! u2 ^" B3 R, W3 ~6 y
NBMA, while the other’s network is p2p, p2mp or p2mp p2mp-nb WITH PRIORITY LARGER THAN THE FIRST ROUTER.
$ }: g# `3 d5 U- B( uThe routers WON’T EXCHANGE routes.
8 f% `7 B; i8 { L5 z7 A+ E4 }@Hellboy: It’s a “select 2 out of 5” type of question and i selected that the router that
, k- ~5 x% m1 h+ xshows as FULL/- is point to point and that the other router won’t send routing updates.# h% j; s" y5 c$ P
" K2 c& y h/ o( e. G' |6- Two routers are connected through PPP connection. After the PPP was established7 i9 Z# b1 s$ J2 j' H
the admin put OSPF running above it. The OSPF formed adjacency but after soon the
) a8 }% k+ J k& h& o* G+ padjacency dropped. What is the reason?
9 W I7 h" b8 t(The cause of OSPF forming an adjacency over a GRE tunnel and dropping immediately)/ k5 b( C( K; Q
A- MTU mismatch6 b9 V: G& g7 X8 F$ A
B- ospf routes contains the route to tunnel destination ( right)
- p, ?% k$ n! j6 @C-Gre tunnel destination is not reachable through tunnel
" R" F, {$ A5 o/ M, s" @>>> if this statement removes “not” then this would probably be the answer,6 X& Z0 D1 q6 {
because the tunnel destination can not be through the tunnel itself,# l3 x0 Y4 @2 o
otherwise would cause Recursive Routing.% @( C# b2 f4 f$ v( I
D-Gre tunnel ip address must be covered by network under “router ospf 1”2 h( H# [$ ]( p
>>> The Tunnel IP subnet needs to be added to the routing process,
; f; K8 j0 X; ^% \. {6 x# r7 q1 Iadd network under router ospf x >>> So this one should be the right answer.
* a! a6 @* U' r' FAnswer: D ???
: `! F/ F9 S+ b9 q8 e% D, nsomeone suggested the following answer but it is not matching the uptions above:
+ I1 ~7 U! U1 y7 MOSPF is configured on the tunnel , and the issue is bcoz the tunnel destination routes thru the tunnel) h: A* }8 [; ? f
+ S: p7 U& |6 J
Tickets
* M, n* F6 ^2 C' w6 c7 oTicket – R1 – IP NAT
: f# I, i' V7 B- X7 p. J3 m/ A/ [This ticket is different, the network 10.2.0.0 is in the NAT ACL list.( I8 F1 c1 `, g- A* m) o
The fault is in router 1 and the cause is the serial that connects to the inside network
# P$ I3 L4 ]4 x* Sis configured with “NAT outside”.6 U% f1 G1 {/ Y# s7 h. x
To correct this fault is to configure “NAT inside”
+ q; L/ J2 Z8 t6 p5 K# f8 u* \4 {) v+ T
Ticket 11 – OSPF to EIGRP
% q! N, f. U- a6 p% {OSPF->EIGRP under router eigrp 10 had to change to ospf_to_eigrp |
86#
2017-6-3 02:20:29
回复(0)
收起回复
|