- 积分
- 0
- 鸿鹄币
- 个
- 好评度
- 点
- 精华
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 阅读权限
- 0
- 听众
- 收听
游客
|

楼主 |
发表于 2011-7-15 13:02:57
|
显示全部楼层
154TK中,下面这段描述很有用,我没怎么看,但出来后,发现BGP的CASE变种,跟这个有点相似,提醒大家注意!!!1 R( \4 t$ C( \) g3 H$ T
+ s6 Q+ d- P4 ~0 W, S* WNew BGP question:0 T |, V* u; K/ |* y+ v
First question is about BGP, involving only 3 of the routers of the topology
+ B" H9 b; N- C, F' qR1 ------ R2 -------R3- O2 l' v1 H5 c3 [' v* f
Shows u the routing table of R1 and partial BGP configuration. R1 Routing Table has 39 C/ t; T1 w3 A% V5 A
routes, one of them is matched by an access list applied to a community setting for, |+ f5 _( E* ]) r0 |* l6 d8 @
neighbor R2. This community is NOT ADVERTISE, which means that the router G' Y; R, j6 l% g/ K; i" U$ x
receiving this route (R2) can use it, but not advertise it to any neighbor. The question
2 o4 a; _) e+ ~is, which routes will R3 have on its BGP table after this. I was wrong and choose the9 N* m' c3 k5 l4 |2 S) a4 F
option that it will only have the other 2 routes, because I supposed that the question
) G3 r9 p. M! ]was related to communities, but I tell you what I really think; R3 will have any of the# [- L, q ^: Y+ W# R6 D9 Y7 S8 V, [
routes since both three are iBGP peers ( no sync is on R1 config and it is supposed to be" m/ s$ `" p; a, f
configured the same in all the AS) Dont let this confuse u. iBGP peers do not advertise1 k/ j/ b+ d3 Y# H0 \0 V
each other routes even if syncronization is disabled (the only way to do it is with route
4 o. G7 c+ {- t8 u* breflectors or confederations) So, my conclusion for the routing question is that no$ M+ F" J9 `( r l. g2 L* z
routes will reach R3 BGP table.
" [1 n5 ?, V/ w' I( v4 E4 B6 E5 jSecond question is about IPV6 multicast.( Over the lan link between two routers)
1 T3 E+ N. Q5 i% `Shows you Mroute entry and gives several options. Right answers are that the multicast: ~' `. D2 b9 F6 h+ N
group in the shared tree is FFF0:0002 (or whatever I dont remember but u should9 e1 X) x, |& E6 q0 I1 F/ q
check it on the (*. XXXX)
, `) C5 a; d2 W( {and the second answer is that a route to the RP has been pruned, which can be
' @; v" G# T/ h( s1 Qconfirmed by checking the flags SPC (sparse mode, connected, pruned)1 {8 g0 e" n! r+ C
Third question is about QOS. Shows u some markings by packet lenght. Options are
8 ?/ T' c8 L7 n6 Othat the firrst class is marking packets which size is between 500 and 1500 bytes, which$ N5 V! ?! K1 Q' Q) V
is RIGHT. Second option is that second class is marking packets with size of 500 with ip
1 M; ^7 E& X# J9 v2 Aprecendence 3 which is not wrong, because altouhg one of the condifions is lenght=0 M6 |1 {& N, V. S# s
500, thsa class statement is a MATCH ALL and there is also another condition) h- I! s; [; d6 d( f* d
regardiong DSCP, so paket lengh is not enough for marlking here. This option is WRONG.
% I4 D2 j" S; J$ l7 iThird option is that one of the clases is marking packets with size = 200 and this is true.% _8 A" p+ K% G
Fourth question is about ipv6 eigrp. over the same lan segment, shows loopbak
" B- S) H& x' \/ Tinterfaces running eigrpV3, everythig n is ok and pings dont work. The right option is! l, B; N# A" n& ?1 |
that u have to configure eigrp process on each router (doing it in only one is not enough) O- i* [7 l4 Y, x; d7 F
This is true because Eigrpv6 needs a no shut under the process to work! |
11#
2011-7-15 13:02:57
回复(0)
收起回复
|