Passed

丝路明珠

First of all I would like to thank all the forum members who helped me in acheiving my dream and secondly I wish good luck to all who are still studiny for their lab exam.

My feedback:
' Z4 Y5 P9 s  M5 D1 A2 V# W7 a0 R
% E, R5 U* {) n4 o) bTSHOOT - OLD
/ d4 {# N2 v# `) c------------------------------------

4 t* B- a: m7 Q5 S1 H+ a& S9 |* |Ticket 1 - Issue with DHCP pool
Ticket 2 - ppp ipcp route default was not configured
Ticket 3 & 4 - Passive interface issues
( X7 _3 ~2 j6 |% d: I" g2 lTicket 5 - Prefix-list was not configured correctly on R21
! M2 j3 D6 _5 Z9 sTicket 6 - Network on R25 for LAN was advertised as /128 so it was ping from R25 sourcing e0/0 but not from mobile so corrected that
Ticket 7 - DMVPN issue on R18
1 V/ r7 Y, H* ?Ticket 8 - too many issues
Ticket 9 - Phase 2 IPSEC (transform-set) was incorrect on R24
$ V: D4 S9 V2 b4 i7 X! DTicket 10 - Secondary IP address was configured on R24 so removed that and NAS then got an IP address

2 z+ M6 t  n2 M1 |" N* r
! {  J  g1 w) N6 Z/ uDiags
2 N3 h" F: ^2 b5 C-------------------------------------
/ j7 g' r( `! C+ D
DHCP Snooping - same as in forum
TCL Scripting - Same as in forum
+ B& o' z6 ~4 A1 D2 a: `

) Y" x$ p$ Q1 C+ NConfig - New
---------------------------------------

1.1 - same as in forum - no snmp traps
1.2 - MST with 3 instances - vlans were mentioned for the instances - VLAN 34 through E2/1
' n# i" J9 I9 z( q1.3 - Cisco proprietry - SW3&SW4 should not initiate connection - SW5&SW6 should initiate connection-Port-channel between 3-5 and 4-6
8 j3 u8 t/ Q( g; [1.4 - WAN interfaces were not in VRF on hub and spokes, rest were all in VRF
" v& W7 ^8 |2 s9 ]
% U& M% L) J* y+ n+ m/ ]" E# W. |' Z2.1- No LSA type 2 and no network statement in DC - Core and other sites were already configured
4 M8 g* u7 H( [0 N2.2 - R17 should send 10.2.0.0/16 as LSA type 3 to spokes. WAN link was not in VRF
2.3 - LB52 was configured as 1kbps and should be seen as external routes on R9 and R10 - no requirement for route tagging
2.4 - 10.0.0.0/8 should be seen as summary route on R15 and R16
2.5 - Loop avoidance
- Q. R. C# k& s" |1 Q2.6 - Advertise routes with 'summary-only' keyword
2.7 - Don't use route-maps so I used distance command
& Q4 f; }$ B2 `5 x6 O7 M4 X2.8 - Advertise routes through backdoor link - No summary address on R55, R56 and no IBGP session from R57 to R55&R56. Here I got stuck with one of the verfication. There were 4 traceroutes for the matching in the exam. 1 was through backdooor which was working - 2 were from Jamesons sites to a prefix in Jamesons DC and traffic was load-balanced through core and these were working fine - the last one was from SW10 to Jameson's DC and traffic was load-balanced all the way through, here i got stuck, traffic was load-balanced in Jacob's site but as soon as it was entering into MPLS from R55 and R56 it was not load balancing - I tried to change IP CEF load-balancing algorithm but it didn't work so I just gave up as I would have lost 1 point for that
2.9 & 2.10 - Same as forum - SW4 was HSRP active switch
2.11 - R17 as RP (cisco proprietry) - R19 was source and R20&R21 were receivers
- F9 V# \0 o" i
Section 3 was same as already reported on forum

4.1 - Same as in forum
4.2 - Didn't attempt it because of broadcast storm
  u" Z+ r9 u6 o5 `
# P9 Y0 C+ M; E2 g: PSection 5 was same as in forum except SW4 was HSRP active switch rather than SW3
* D! s( z0 x1 N7 x
8 O# F/ W# F" m1 b" i; ^0 d1 tMy opinion is none of the available solution is completely valid but Spoto solution and Crystal IOU were the closest to the lab (both shared on forum) but don't just stick with one IOU and practice on couple at least to challenge yourself. I mainly used Crystal, Spoto and the one shared CCIEMAN2016 IOUs
2 @. [) M+ z; t3 |
$ w* a7 u) N/ @' LI had my own sequence for both TSHOOT and Config which really helped me in finishing the lab well within the time

末末默默TMAC

北斗君

感谢战报，记性真好

Yi-Chang

Thank you for sharing.

Rockyw

感谢楼主分享！

jamesscooby

感謝樓主無思分享