设为首页收藏本站language 语言切换
查看: 2778|回复: 3
收起左侧

看到关于NEW DIAG的战报,直接搬运过来

[复制链接]
发表于 2016-4-9 10:23:14 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 orthogonal 于 2016-4-9 14:37 编辑
  D* f( F% f, R8 r' B2 L. t/ _
! M4 `& x+ l7 \  f0 XMy friend took the exam in the month of February . He faced the new diag and confirm the scenario that described before in other posts
9 y9 Z3 ?; P8 W* R0 \% g4 R7 Y7 P
1 hsrpipv6

& x3 \+ {  C) `: W6 w
7 R8 R) v# N, ]  ]% U) a, X: `
& m, E5 f! V0 D- {* s( I" F- \q1 which device has the problem. unknown device in the lan

7 p4 E" M- I" c! Bq2quick fix increase the hsrp priority of ce2 ( currently standby)

& c6 ^. ~7 W6 k! [) G& g, v* Bq3 packet capture packet id - find the RA packet  with source ip different from CE1 and CE2

0 T9 S* H0 a& f, G, U( K; K- Y: t
& V; j( R. u5 ^9 s+ v2 multicast

4 E$ e; N% q/ @
* e$ i9 r$ X5 a1? what is the  issue RP address in r3 not know ( 0.0.0.0 )
' @9 Q" ^, M- q% b
2 what can ask to help resolve the case : why  is r3 missing the route to RP ( r4 )

& M& h3 q) o  Z. Q6 u4 ~! A$ _3 quick fix. static host route in r3 pointing to address of the rp

; `1 _( }+ n1 z
发表于 2016-4-10 11:57:46 | 显示全部楼层
witch direction?RS?SP?
板凳 2016-4-10 11:57:46 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-4-11 14:56:38 | 显示全部楼层
分享是种美德
地板 2016-4-11 14:56:38 回复 收起回复
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 论坛注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|sitemap|鸿鹄论坛 ( 京ICP备14027439号 )  

GMT+8, 2025-5-7 14:05 , Processed in 0.237301 second(s), 22 queries , Redis On.  

  Powered by Discuz!

  © 2001-2025 HH010.COM

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表