|
本帖最后由 xandlq 于 2013-3-22 01:53 编辑
Refer to the exhibit. Currently the two eBGP links between AS100 and AS200 have an average inbound
load of 65% and 20% respectively. After further investigation, traffic to 10.10.1.16/28 accounts for 45%, and
traffic to 10.10.1.32/28 and to 10.10.1.48/28 each account for 20% of the inbound load. The BGP attributes
are currently set at their default values in both autonomous systems.
If you want to influence how AS200 sends traffic to AS100, which eBGP configurations would you configure
in AS100 to influence AS200 to use the eBGP links more evenly? (Choose two.)
Select 2 response(s).
A. neighbor 192.168.30.2 route-map as_50 out
B. neighbor 192.168.20.2 route-map as_50 out
C. route-map as_50 permit 10
match ip address 50
set metric 150
access-list 50 permit 10.10.1.16 0.0.0.240
D. route-map as_50 permit 10
match ip address 50
set metric 150
access-list 50 permit 10.10.1.32 0.0.0.240
如上所示,这道题为什么要选BC,我觉得是BD,要让as200到as100的流量更均衡,抓出10.10.1.32/28设置med让其从B进入AS100,这样回程流量上面走45%,下面走40%,对as200到as100的流量就很均衡了,这样的话就是BD了;
但BGP通信是基于TCP的,有去包有回包,上面的策略只是对单向数据做到了均衡,如果要来回的数据都能均衡走两条链路,还是要把10.1.1.16/28抓出来让其走B进入AS100(占45%带宽的这个网络去时走B,回时走A),这样综合起来就会更均衡,所以想想BC也是合理的,纠结。。。高手们能否说说你们的看法。
|
|