NEW TS3 !!!

eric_chenliang

Question1 ipv6 phone q
0 W/ H9 \2 V3 c% i6 B7 `0 parea d
. k! ~' q( J) O4 fIn one of the areas in right hand side  say area d there are aipv6  phone (which is a router) you need to get working to ping x
answer
it is just missing a ospf peering one router upstream.

Question 2 frame multicast
& h2 z/ s6 {: S3 R% `In area h there is a frame relay area running multicast with multicastboundaries denying .39.40 - need to change to permit,  also msdp inin here but this is up,
answer - permit multicast on the boundaries
also 2 RP's between areas

Update 3/12/12
$ C5 }/ B7 o# D( V9 e  P2 FBeen labbing  / thinking about this multicast boundary q - maybe theyare there for a reason as there are 2 rps that makes essentially 2 multicast RPzones if you like and if you were to separate them this is how you would do it.
So review the topology and what is supposed to go where use the helicopterapproach (Himawan Nugroho ;-) ) - admittedly it's like getting the MDSP q forthe first time will take a while to understand what's going on.  
I don't think this type of stuff is fair really they should say in the q x ping224.x.x.x and RX and RY are rps for x routers - otherwise it's a guessing game.
6 |0 W" g+ }- P2 CIf this was a real life TS situation the customer would tell you this stuff.
Same time though - if it looks straight forward and these boundaries are juststopping RP info filtering down - do the allow .39 .40 ...;-)

9 }! q. v  K1 b  L: N, }+ [Question 3 tunnels... Get x to ping y
  T( e2 T5 O5 U7 F3 d" V8 Varea d area f  have x y these area connected via a tunnel on aupstream router in the core i.e. 4 6 peer via the tunnel.
5 b9 B# F* R1 B0 I, H/ Fanswer -
# n' c( M" r; b" \# W; c4 btunnels have no sources  and are type mpls ts - add source removetype
.i.e.
!
7 D; f: l  O( Q4 A4 L/ z6 f3 Pinterface Tunnel1ip address 100.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
4 J8 W% [. W; vtunnel mode mpls traffic-eng <<<< remove this
tunnel source x.x.x.x <<<<<< add this
tunnel dest x.x.x.x
no routing dynamic

Update 3/12/12
labbed this up again today - if the mode is mpls it drops sources forexample...
  Z6 n) ^' A6 G9 ]/ u7 LR5(config)#interface Tunnel1
. f/ F6 `3 X# |% l2 L. `5 VR5(config-if)#ip address 100.1.1.5 255.255.255.0
* g( R+ p$ h4 x+ ~+ oR5(config-if)#tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
R5(config-if)#tunnel source 10.1.1.5
Source is setautomatically for "Tag Switching" tunnels
' L; R6 _  b7 xR5(config-if)#tunnel dest 10.1.1.4
, |+ Q  G4 ]& {) J9 U
3 A9 K4 f3 {' N$ d: zmpls traffic-eng is not on the blue print so logic says the mode is wrong ?
+ `" A2 a- A+ Y$ S' E' q" PSo Change mode to gre and put a source on it.
4 i0 l' u3 q- p2 s) hIf anyone knows more about  mpls traffic-eng tunnels feel free to PMme and discuss this question.

Question 4 frame / qos - match this...
/ ?  u- Z  Z. Q% ~) wq asks you to ping through this matching class voice tos 160 / precedence 5
* y% |- X7 G# Q3 O1 x# E
R20(config)#do p
' a* u4 L8 v- M- Q0 CTarget IP address: 10.1.1.23
Repeat count [5]: 10000
5 @( [9 v7 {/ p$ aExtended commands [n]: y
. k, k# G0 E; s" Y% rType of service [0]:160

Type escape sequence to abort.
3 d' Z9 |4 {% s7 z( J7 I) ]% TSending 10000, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.23, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
& _* |, p! Q% q! m: _* }!
1 k" r; a! B* [6 [3 WR22(config-map-class)#do clear counters
Clear "show interface" counters on all interfaces [confirm]
$ }8 H5 d4 q7 O% c% O
9 d3 M! A: a; m" J  d5 j+ `/ I6 i9 CR22(config)#do sh policy-map int s1/1 | b DLCI 22
; f! p3 y' @/ g4 S& FSerial1/1: DLCI 22 -
" U0 H6 a! `* l" l/ f9 e
  Service-policy output: FRTS

Class-map: VOICE (match-all)
  1023 packets, 106392 bytes
, W2 q# I; v1 E' \  30 second offered rate 15000 bps
% b% N4 j- s0 f  Match: ipprecedence 5

& b, D( P& {! V3 o. f, QClass-map: class-default (match-any)
* F! [2 m4 K3 t  O2 Q, O5 q% l  34 packets, 2295 bytes
; E: @" J, c, p& F; a  30 second offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
" t, d. B5 ?# R  Match: any

faults
/ T9 V) z# G$ e) mini config the interface is missing

- Q/ G. e! b/ _" ?0 Q& nframe-relay traffic-shaping

also for the rate of 15000 do
/ @( i. }8 u. S- M' l% S
map-class frame-relay EEK
+ v# y; v# U/ v- R& ~frame-relay cir 1000
frame-relay cir 96000 <<<<<< change to get the rate above

6 Y; O+ e) D1 v: p) h. r6 Fanswers
7 _$ s0 ?& h. V* J) u2 L1enable frame traffic shaping
8 o% W5 n2 x0 g7 q2 cir rate to 96000 from 1000 (pings fail !.!.!) due the rate being set to 1000bits
3 ?6 x4 N9 P" h
: ?( L0 V$ G# K" d& ?: u6 Q
Question 5 ip SLA q - fix sla print screen ...
+ M6 r, O0 F, P! H; Nanswer source dest wrong way round - change works fine.
/ E' q" E& n- {3 j# @$ x! h& Z
9 @, e! q4 g, \/ ]
% w$ ?$ z( }" X2 s4 t, XQuestion 6 ping www.cisco.com (DNS resolution)match below
R20(config)#do p www.cisco.com

9 Q0 ~, A1 l( sTranslating "www.cisco.com"...domain server (10.1.1.22) [OK]
% i9 @4 b2 ]. n$ X2 D
( Z" Z) F0 _; N, x% J$ Y$ iType escape sequence to abort.
' z' G# x  C3 @7 USending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.23, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
6 z' s+ M/ {* h% H- KSuccess rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 40/61/76 ms
3 }2 S0 b- B$ [8 R0 G4 u
! z/ z& o  Q8 F) X& s(mocked up on R20 client R22 dns server)
answer
* O; r: D8 }& Z: _6 V
5 Y% s: T4 [# g. d. d$ m$ |R20 client
ip name-server 10.1.1.22
ip domain-lookup

R22 server
ip host www.cisco.com 10.1.1.23
. x8 f& I, o. D, `" dip dns server
. A- O8 N5 U7 S9 ^

wariii_mo

出来了。。

dingyichao

出来了啊

huangtidi

yuzhihui0

看了LZ的帖子，我只想说一句很好很强大！

jy5208812

啥也不说了，楼主就是给力！

fate3008

Archercjj

shi351953026

啥也不说了，楼主就是给力！

soulzen

看了LZ的帖子，我只想说一句很好很强大！

winddew

LZ贴出来的部分跟hugo_520帖子里的一样，不过hugo_520发布的资料里还有更多的一点点内容和拓扑图。

lcfily

看了LZ的帖子，我只想说一句很好很强大！

xiaoshou0427

方哥hold住

蛋疼了。。。。

djjtop