- 积分
- 27
- 鸿鹄币
- 个
- 好评度
- 点
- 精华
- 注册时间
- 2012-10-27
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 听众
- 收听
网络小学徒
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce574/ce5743cb734163864a42ad5212932b8150d4dd8d" alt="Rank: 1"
|
A medium-sized company has a Class C IP address. It has two Cisco routers and one non-Cisco router.
All three routers are using RIP version 1. The company network is using the block of 198.133.219.0/24.
The company has decided it would be a good idea to split the network into three smaller subnets and
create the option of conserving addresses with VLSM. What is the best course of action if the company
wants to have 40 hosts in each of the three subnets?
A. Convert all the routers to EIGRP and use 198.133.219.32/27, 198.133.219.64/27, and
198.133.219.92/27 as the new subnetworks.
B. Maintain the use of RIP version 1 and use 198.133.219.32/27, 198.133.219.64/27, and 133.219.92/27
as the new subnetworks.
C. Convert all the routers to EIGRP and use 198.133.219.64/26, 198.133.219.128/26, and 133.219.192/26
as the new subnetworks.
D. Convert all the routers to RIP version 2 and use 198.133.219.64/26, 198.133.219.128/26, and
133.219.192/26 as the new subnetworks.
E. Convert all the routers to OSPF and use 198.133.219.16/28, 198.133.219.32/28, and
198.133.219.48/28 as the new subnetworks.
F. Convert all the routers to static routes and use 198.133.219.16/28, 198.133.219.32/28, and
D
|
|