个人觉得R4向R6通告该BGP条目,R6重分发进EIGRP后通告给R7,虽然R5从R7通过EIGRP学到了该路由,但是从R3学到的eBGP路由管距是20,小于EIGRP D EX的管距170,所以对R5来说,这条应该是BGP路由而非EIGRP路由,并不会将该路由再重分发进BGP通告给R3。
从R5上show的结果来看,EIGRP中只有一条关于10.20.0.0/16的条目,即从BGP重分发进EIGRP的,并没有从R7通告过来的。WHY ?
R5_AS30#sho ip eigrp topology 10.20.0.0 255.255.0.0
IP-EIGRP (AS 30): Topology entry for 10.20.0.0/16
State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 2169856
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
10.100.83.1, from Redistributed, Send flag is 0x0
Composite metric is (2169856/0), Route is External
Vector metric:
Minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit
Total delay is 20000 microseconds
Reliability is 255/255
Load is 1/255
Minimum MTU is 1500
Hop count is 0
External data:
Originating router is 172.30.255.254 (this system)
AS number of route is 30
External protocol is BGP, external metric is 0
Administrator tag is 100 (0x00000064)